Above the Fold: Play-money efficacy
Play-money efficacy in forecasting
Many skeptics don’t think Manifold Markets can be taken seriously due to “monopoly money” not creating real incentives. However, our calibration analytics and recent performance forecasting the midterms suggest otherwise.
Check out this poll we did:
Jack, our top all-time trader, created an awesome writeup comparing different sites.
These are log scores, green (closer to 0) means more accurate, red (more negative) means less accurate. For comparison, predicting 50% for everything gets log score -0.69
As you can see, none of the 4 top performing sites involves real money. However, the Salem Manifold instance which works exactly the same as Manifold Markets suggests the disparity may stem from the political demographic of each site rather than a significant difference in forecasting ability.
I found this Reddit comment made some compelling arguments for play-money.
“I think we should consider the possibility that using play money might actually be better than using real money:
It's accessible to a larger audience of potential forecasters with more diversity in both disposable income and personality type (risk tolerance, attitude toward legal grey areas, etc.)
The perceived stakes of bets may be higher for the average user: instead of betting your lunch money, you might be betting a significant fraction of your available resources. We know from video games that people can really care a lot about virtual currency.
People with more real-life money can't buy more influence over the market. The only people with disproportionate power to push the market around are those who've already proven to be exceptional forecasters.”
Here is the article the prompted the above discussion on Reddit:
We have direct (received $1.5m in grants and investments) and indirect (Effective altruism) ties with FTX. Fortunately, our site will not directly be affected by recent events, although we are nevertheless deeply saddened.
With the uncertainty came a heightened interest in our markets. We saw an uptick in traffic to our site with users using our markets to elevate their understanding of the situation as it unfolded. This is becoming a common trigger for user re-engagement: breaking news → uncertainty → markets to provide some certainty.
Here are a couple of markets from the FTX Insolvency Crisis group.
Hopefully, Manifold Markets never gives out more mana than it can cover. 😬
Manifold in the Wild
The first thing you should read is Scott Alexander’s latest Mantic Monday which is increasingly becoming Manifold Mondays! He discusses FTX and Twitter drama, midterms calibration, and attempts to do some market manipulation of his own on Manifold!
In our previous newsletters, we often included some discussion around various links related to Manifold. For the next couple of weeks, I am instead going to experiment with creating more frequent summaries and upload them to this group on Manifold.
Fraud markets drama
Destiny users crash a market temporarily due to the high frequency of trades
Destiny users create a live stocks tracker
Analysis of Manifold Market’s performance in forecasting the midterms
You can still expect the newsletter to directly cover anything big happening on Manifold Markets itself. And, anything particularly spicy will be covered in more depth in the newsletter compared to the frequent posts.
Fifa 2022 Qatar $500 World Cup competition
Check out our World cup competition!
Not pictured: Major rework of Multiple choice markets.
They now use our fixed payout binary market system (similar to Yes/No markets). This means you can now short answers too!